>>>>
AP

Acacia Plan Management

Level 1/655 Sherwood Rd, Sherwood QLD 4075, Australia
★★★★★4.8(123 reviews)
Call 1300 697 526Visit websiteIs this your listing?

About Acacia Plan Management

Acacia Plan Management is an NDIS-registered provider based in Sherwood, Queensland, serving participants across Beenleigh, Brisbane, Logan. They offer 1 types of support including plan management.

Based on 123 Google reviews, Acacia Plan Management holds a 4.8-star rating, which puts them in the top tier for provider feedback in the Beenleigh service area.

Services Acacia Plan Management provides

  • Plan management

Understanding plan management under the NDIS

The most common complaints about plan management are slow invoice processing, opaque budget reporting, and provider-payment failures that the participant only finds out about when the provider chases them. None of these are inherent to plan management — they're operational failings that vary widely between providers. Before signing with any plan manager, ask three questions: what's their median invoice-to-payment time (the answer should be 3-5 business days), do they offer a real-time online budget portal (most reputable providers do), and how do they handle provider payment disputes (a good answer involves contacting both parties before withholding payment).

Plan management fees come from a separate budget line in your NDIS plan ($108.84 setup, $16.28/month under the 2025-26 NDIS Pricing Arrangements). They don't reduce your therapy or support-worker funding. If you switch plan managers mid-plan, the new provider can charge the setup fee again — so the choice is worth getting right at the start.

A frequently-overlooked benefit of plan management is access to unregistered NDIS providers. Agency-managed participants can only use registered providers; this restricts choice in many service categories (notably support coordination, psychology, and occupational therapy in regional areas). Plan management opens the unregistered market while still offloading the administrative burden.

Reporting frequency varies meaningfully. Some plan managers send a monthly statement; others provide a real-time dashboard. For participants whose plan is tight, real-time visibility is materially more useful — it lets you adjust service patterns before you run out of funding rather than after.

What to ask before choosing an NDIS provider

Before signing a service agreement with any NDIS provider, including Acacia Plan Management, it’s worth having a conversation about a few key things. What are the hourly rates, including loadings for evenings, weekends and public holidays? What cancellation fees apply, and what notice period do they require? Who will your regular support worker or practitioner be, and what happens if they’re sick or on leave? How does the provider handle complaints? These questions are standard — any reputable provider will have clear answers.

If Acacia Plan Management is registered with the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, they’re bound by the NDIS Code of Conduct and must meet service standards audited by approved quality auditors. This covers everything from worker screening to incident reporting. Unregistered providers can still be used by plan-managed and self-managed participants but aren’t subject to the same oversight.

It’s also worth understanding your service agreement before you sign it. The agreement should clearly state the supports being delivered, the price per hour or unit, any cancellation policy, how travel charges are handled, and how either party can end the agreement. Under the NDIS, you can usually change providers, subject to the notice and cancellation terms in your service agreement. If a provider’s service agreement doesn’t include a reasonable exit clause, that’s worth questioning.

If you’re unsure about any aspect of choosing a provider, your support coordinator or local area coordinator (LAC) can help. They can explain what to look for, accompany you to initial meetings, and assist with setting up service agreements that protect your interests. Keeping records of your interactions with providers — save invoices, note key conversations, and track whether the services delivered match what was agreed — will make plan reviews smoother and provide evidence if you ever need to raise a complaint.

NDIS supports in Beenleigh

The Beenleigh service district covers 85+ suburbs and hosts 425+ registered NDIS providers. Participants in this area typically access services in their local community, though many providers including Acacia Plan Management travel to clients at home. Travel charges under the NDIS are capped and must be agreed in your service agreement before work begins.

Most participants in Beenleigh access a mix of services — commonly support worker, community nursing and transport. Whether you’re looking for ongoing support or need a specific assessment, comparing providers in your area is the best way to find the right fit for your goals and circumstances.

Quick info

LocationSherwood
Phone1300 697 526
Rating4.8/5 (123 reviews)
Services1
Areas3 districts
Call 1300 697 526

Is this your business?

Claim this listing to update your details and connect with participants.

Claim listing

Is this your business?

Claim this listing to update your details and connect with participants.

Claim listing
🔄
Not the right fit?
You can switch NDIS providers at any time. See how →

Other providers in Beenleigh

Above and Beyond Home Care
Beenleigh
Aidacare - Mobility & Healthcare Equipment
Burleigh Heads
Open Minds - Logan
Slacks Creek
Allamanda Care
Chambers Flat
View all providers in Beenleigh →

Have you used this provider?

Help other NDIS participants. Reviews are published with your first name and relationship; your email is kept private and only used for verification.

Not published. Used only to verify your review and contact you if needed.

Looking for a GP near Sherwood? Find general practitioners on GPScout →
Understanding your NDIS plan? Read the SortedAus NDIS overview →
JEditorial content by , Editor · Provider data from public NDIS sources · Editorial standards